Framework quietly but steadily has shifted its approach to software support for its modular laptops, moving from a history of inconsistent updates to a more reliable and continuous cycle of BIOS and driver improvements. Over the past five years, the company has built a narrative around repairability, upgradeability, and user customization. Yet, for much of that period, software updates—especially BIOS updates, driver packages, and security patches—lagged behind expectations. The April 2024 reporting highlighted a stubborn gap: the original Framework Laptop 13, among others, had boards that went years without BIOS updates or refreshed driver packages, and Windows 11 compatibility remained a moving target for several generations. Linux support also faced headwinds, with functional upgrades promised for other models appearing uneven at best. In that context, Framework’s leadership acknowledged the shortcomings and pledged a substantive change. The company’s chief executive, Nirav Patel, explained that the constraints stemmed from scale and reliance on upstream hardware makers like Intel and AMD, rather than a reluctance to invest in support. He stressed that Framework was not standing still; a dedicated effort was underway to overhaul how updates are authored, tested, and delivered, with the aim of ensuring no model is left behind for extended periods.
This push toward sustained software support has since culminated in a clear, structural change: the creation of a dedicated team at Compal, the white-box PC manufacturing partner that fabricates a substantial portion of Framework’s hardware. Patel described this team as a focused corps designed to accelerate and standardize the update process across Framework’s broader catalog. The onboarding of this team was positioned as a turning point, enabling a disciplined cadence for BIOS and driver updates across current and legacy products. The plan, he said, was straightforward in principle: once the Compal team was fully integrated, Framework would systematically cycle through its entire lineup, ensuring that each model receives timely updates and that older devices are not forgotten amid the excitement around new releases. While Patel admitted that the mid-summer 2024 target was optimistic, there was a prevailing sense that real progress had begun and that a more predictable update path was taking shape for the first time in Framework’s history.
In the months since, the trajectory has borne out a measurable shift in software support, with tangible improvements evident across Framework’s laptops. An overarching theme has been the alignment of software support with the hardware refresh cycle, rather than reactionary patches tied to sporadic user reports or limited beta programs. The pivotal change is not just that updates exist, but that they arrive with regularity across the product line, spanning BIOS revisions, driver optimizations, and notable feature enhancements. This shift—supported by a more robust supply chain and coordinated upstream collaboration—has laid the groundwork for a sustainable model of software stewardship, one designed to evolve alongside Intel, AMD, and other key upstream contributors.
This renewed emphasis on sustaining software updates has become especially relevant as Framework’s lineup continues to expand. The company has long asserted that its value proposition centers on longevity and upgradability, with upgrades designed to extend the usable life of its machines. The introduction of a more formalized sustaining software update program signals a recognition that hardware design alone cannot preserve a device’s usefulness; ongoing software maintenance is indispensable to delivering ongoing performance, security, and reliability. The new approach also responds to a broader industry expectation: modern laptops, especially those marketed for repairability and modularity, must deliver long-tail support to justify their upfront cost and the environmental benefits of extended lifespans. In practice, this means a structured regime of updates that covers both the most recent models and the earlier generations that still power countless user workflows.
The early years of Framework’s software support, characterized by uneven cadence and occasional gaps, are now contrasted with a more consistent pattern of updates. The company’s update status page, as of late June 2025, shows a notable advancement: every single one of Framework’s laptops has received at least one BIOS and driver update in the past calendar year. This is not merely a statistical milestone; it is a signal that the company has moved from episodic updates to an ongoing maintenance discipline that covers the entire product spectrum. The progressive improvement also reflects the team’s ability to coordinate with upstream vendors and to translate those upstream changes into end-user software packages that improve bug fixes, security, and performance. The result is a more coherent and predictable experience for Framework users, who now benefit from a higher likelihood that their devices will stay current with both new capabilities and essential protections.
In the broader ecosystem, the momentum behind Framework’s sustained software updates is reinforced by user-driven signals and industry chatter. A widely circulated discussion thread on Framework’s community-driven channels provides a high-level, long-view perspective on how driver package and BIOS release cadences have evolved since 2021, when the company first shipped its modular Laptop 13. Across the product line, the pattern has shifted from sporadic, sometimes-infrequent updates to a more continuous release rhythm that aligns with the cadence of upstream hardware makers. While the driver packages for older generations lag somewhat behind the most current releases, the trend line is clear: a sustained update program has become the default operating mode, with the majority of models receiving updates at least once a year and many models receiving multiple updates within a calendar year. The result is not only improved security and performance but also a stronger confidence among developers, partners, and customers that Framework remains committed to long-term product viability.
As part of the broader narrative on updates, it’s important to understand the role of Linux support within the Framework ecosystem. Framework has consistently worked to ensure Linux users can access BIOS updates and firmware improvements, often through the Linux Vendor Firmware Service (LVFS). The LVFS-based updates are particularly meaningful for Linux environments because they enable many machines to receive firmware updates without requiring Windows installations or manual flashing. In practice, this means that a large portion of the user base can stay current with essential firmware and security updates through their preferred Linux distribution’s updater tools. The LVFS-enabled updates have become a cornerstone of Framework’s Linux strategy, underscoring the company’s commitment to accessibility and platform diversity. In testing across various distributions, these updates typically arrive with straightforward installation processes, reducing user friction and promoting a smoother update experience for Linux enthusiasts.
One notable exception to the LVFS update path concerns the 12th-generation Intel Core version of the Laptop 13. This particular variant has a caveat: LVFS cannot update the Intel Management Engine (IME) firmware, because LVFS does not distribute the necessary Intel binary files to perform those updates. Framework has addressed this gap by offering an alternate BIOS update method that can be installed through the hardware’s built-in EFI shell, which provides Linux users with an avenue for comprehensive firmware updates without requiring Windows. This dual-path approach demonstrates the company’s willingness to provide platform-appropriate solutions while maintaining security and reliability across configurations. It also illustrates the complexity of firmware update ecosystems where certain firmware components—like IME—have vendor-specific constraints and distribution channels that must be navigated carefully to avoid compromising system integrity.
Beyond firmware, other notable improvements have accompanied the broader software update push. For instance, some frames of the Laptop 13 lineup, and the broader family, now boast features such as Thunderbolt certification for the Core Ultra variant and a lineup-wide Battery Extender feature for the 61 Wh battery. The Battery Extender feature, which limits maximum charging when a laptop is plugged in for extended periods (five days or more, as described in the company’s communications), addresses a common user concern about battery degradation and long-term health. These enhancements are not mere novelty features; they are practical benefits that improve real-world usability, particularly for power users and professionals who rely on their Framework devices for extended work sessions. In conjunction with these software upgrades, the company has emphasized a disciplined approach to maintenance that extends across generations of hardware, reinforcing the idea that Framework’s devices are designed to endure through multiple product cycles with ongoing improvements.
From a leadership perspective, the sustaining software update program is not a one-off initiative but a codified, ongoing strategy. Patel has framed the effort as a long-term commitment rather than a temporary fix. In conversations with Ars Technica and within internal briefings, he asserted that the sustaining team is fully powered up and actively releasing multiple BIOS and driver updates each month across all generations of Framework products. The explicit condition for continuing updates, according to Patel, is straightforward: updates will be provided for as long as Intel and AMD continue to deliver upstream support that Framework relies on to maintain its platforms. This stance reflects a philosophy of mutual dependency with upstream chipmakers—recognizing that Framework’s ability to sustain software updates hinges on the ongoing collaboration and release cycles of these upstream partners. It also signals a practical, vendor-agnostic approach to updates, ensuring Framework remains adaptable to changes in the broader hardware ecosystem.
As Framework’s product lineup expands, the update program’s scope naturally grows in complexity. The company is currently supporting six distinct versions of the Laptop 13 motherboard, in addition to the Laptop 16 and the Laptop 12. The inclusion of a new desktop product—aptly named the Framework Desktop—has added to the scope of the sustaining software effort, with the project slated to launch later in the year. The reality is that maintaining a coherent update cadence across multiple generations and distinct product families requires meticulous project management, cross-team coordination, and robust testing. In practice, this means a centralized framework for testing BIOS and driver changes across all supported hardware variants, as well as a rollback mechanism and clear communication channels to inform users when updates may affect stability or require driver reconfigurations. Framework’s updated process signals a maturation of its software strategy, from a focus on delivering new hardware and features to a balanced emphasis on keeping older devices healthy and secure while simultaneously advancing newer models.
From a broader perspective, the company’s trajectory suggests a more sustainable balance between “newness” and “stability.” Early years often emphasized rapid product spin-ups and new releases, with a relatively lighter footprint on sustaining older platforms. The current approach appears to be much more deliberate about backward compatibility and long-term maintenance. For customers, this translates into longer-supported devices, better security postures, and more reliable performance over time. For the ecosystem at large, Framework’s approach sets a benchmark for modular, repairable laptops, demonstrating that it is possible to reconcile rapid product development with a rigorous and transparent maintenance regime. The practical implications extend beyond individual users: IT departments, educators, and enthusiasts who rely on Framework hardware for critical tasks now have greater assurance that devices in active use will continue to receive essential firmware, security, and performance improvements long after purchase.
In summary, Framework’s software support narrative has transformed from a period of sporadic updates and unfulfilled promises into a structured, ongoing, and scalable approach to firmware and driver maintenance. The company’s leadership, notably Nirav Patel, has framed the transformation as a response to real customer needs and a recognition that sustainability in the hardware you sell is inseparable from the software that powers it. The creation of a dedicated Compal team, the expansion of Linux and LVFS support, and the steady cadence of BIOS and driver updates across its current and legacy devices collectively mark a significant upgrade in Framework’s commitment to long-term software health. While challenges remain—such as navigating the limitations of certain firmware components and continuing to expand coverage to every model—the overall direction is clear: Framework is building a resilient, future-proof support ecosystem for a line of laptops defined by repairability, upgradeability, and user-centric design.
Section 1 continues with a closer examination of the company’s strategic shift, the operational implications of the Compal partnership, and the measurable outcomes observed since June 2025. The story is not just about updated drivers or newer features; it is about a worked-out process for sustaining software quality over time, a process that recognizes the interdependence of hardware design, firmware governance, and software stewardship in delivering durable, secure, and reliable computing experiences.
Building the Sustaining Software Update Operation
To understand the transformation in Framework’s software support, it is essential to examine the organizational and operational changes that underpinned the shift. At the heart of the change is a dedicated team at Compal, Framework’s primary hardware manufacturing partner. This team’s onboarding marked a decisive move away from ad hoc, dispersed updates toward a centralized, accountable update workflow. The onboarding was designed to establish a repeatable cycle for updates, ensuring that each Framework model—across the Laptop 13 family, the Laptop 16, the Laptop 12, and beyond—receives BIOS and driver updates on a predictable schedule. The goal was to make software maintenance as integral to product stewardship as the hardware architecture itself, rather than a optional afterthought.
The Compal team’s responsibilities encompass several interconnected tasks. First, they must maintain alignment with Intel and AMD’s upstream update cadences. This means tracking new processor generations, firmware changes, and driver improvements as they are released upstream, then translating those changes into Framework-compatible packages. This requires a robust testing regime across all supported platforms to identify potential regressions and ensure compatibility with Framework’s modular design philosophy. The team must also coordinate with Framework’s software development and quality assurance groups to validate updates before deployment, performing regression testing to minimize the risk of destabilizing existing configurations. Given the diversity of the product line—including variations within the Laptop 13 motherboard family, as well as the Laptop 16 and Laptop 12—the testing matrix is nontrivial, demanding careful planning, resource allocation, and detailed test matrices.
A critical aspect of the operation is the order in which devices receive updates and how updates are staged for release. The company has emphasized that no model should be neglected, a principle that translates into a tiered but inclusive update strategy. Older hardware receives security patches, bug fixes, and performance enhancements where feasible, while newer hardware benefits from the latest firmware features and optimizations. The ongoing cycle is designed to prevent long gaps between updates, which historically created security and stability concerns for owners of Framework devices. The sustained cadence ensures that even devices launched several years ago do not become outdated or vulnerable in the face of new software requirements.
The partnership with Compal also helps address one of the core constraints previously cited by Framework executives: reliance on upstream hardware makers for key updates. By bringing a dedicated team in-house—albeit through the partner company—Framework gains a direct line to the upstream release process and a structured channel for distributing those updates to its devices. This arrangement helps reduce the lag between upstream releases and end-user deployment, which in the past could stretch for months or longer. It also creates a clear accountability path for software updates, enabling more straightforward communication with customers about what is being updated and why, and providing better visibility into the impact of each update.
Testing and validation remain central to the process. With six distinct Laptop 13 motherboard versions, plus the Laptop 16 and Laptop 12, the team must ensure broad compatibility across configurations. The complexity increases when you consider different storage options, display panels, wireless modules, and CPUs, all of which may influence BIOS behavior or driver compatibility. The team’s approach includes automated testing pipelines, together with manual QA steps to catch scenarios that automated tests might miss. This combination helps minimize the risk that an update will introduce new issues while preserving the gains in security, reliability, and performance. In addition, a well-defined rollback process provides a safety net in the event that a new BIOS or driver update introduces instability on certain configurations. The ability to revert to a known-good state is a critical component of any enterprise-grade update strategy, and Framework’s current approach reflects this priority.
The sustaining software update program is also tied to a broader hardware strategy that views long-term maintenance as a core product feature rather than a separate afterthought. This is particularly important given the company’s long-standing emphasis on repairability and upgradeability. The notion of a modular, replaceable, and upgradable laptop is most meaningful when the software that powers it remains usable and secure over time. By institutionalizing a disciplined update process, Framework communicates a consistent promise to customers: that the company will invest in their devices well beyond the initial purchase. The practical effect is a higher degree of confidence among users who rely on Framework laptops for mission-critical tasks, as well as a more favorable perception among developers, system administrators, and enthusiasts who value long-term software support.
In addition to the operational changes, leadership has underscored that sustaining software updates are not a one-time project but a continuous, evolving program. The plan is to keep refining the update workflow—balancing the demands of new product development with the obligation to maintain older devices—and to adapt to the evolving needs of upstream vendors and Linux users alike. Patel’s statements reflect a commitment to an ongoing process rather than a fixed milestone, signaling to customers and partners that Framework intends to remain a living, adapting platform. This mindset is essential for sustaining a modular architecture in which multiple generations of hardware coexist and require long-term software compatibility guarantees.
The Compal-led update operation has also catalyzed a broader cultural shift within Framework. The company has moved toward a more transparent, data-driven approach to software maintenance. Public or semi-public dashboards that track update presence, the consistency of BIOS and driver versions across devices, and the rate of security patches provide users with a clearer picture of how well the company maintains its products. This transparency helps build trust and reduces the anxiety that often accompanies hardware purchases that aspire to be repairable and upgradable but fall short in practical maintenance. It also offers a valuable feedback loop: users can report issues, which go into the testing cycle and inform future updates. In short, the sustaining software update operation is not only about delivering updates; it is about building a more accountable, responsive, and user-centric software ecosystem around Framework hardware.
The resulting improvements are not theoretical. They are evidenced by behavior in the field, including a more predictable cadence of BIOS and driver updates and broader Linux firmware updates through LVFS. The operationalization of the update process—driven by a dedicated Compal team, validated by rigorous testing, and implemented via coordinated upstream collaboration—delivers a tangible upgrade in user experience. It reduces uncertainty about whether devices will continue to receive essential improvements and security patches, which is particularly important for an audience that gamely supports a modular, repairable, and long-lived platform. In the end, the sustaining software update operation reflects a mature approach to product stewardship, one that aligns with customers’ expectations for durable, secure, and well-supported hardware.
Evidence of Progress as of June 25, 2025
A crucial milestone in Framework’s software-support journey is the evidence of progress visible across the product lineup. As of June 25, 2025, the company’s laptops show a clear, positive trend in BIOS and driver updates. The status page, which has evolved into a practical barometer of ongoing maintenance, confirms that every Framework laptop model has received at least one BIOS update and one driver update within the previous calendar year. This is a noteworthy improvement over the situation observed in April 2024, when several Laptop 13 iterations had not seen BIOS updates for extended periods. The June 2025 snapshot demonstrates a sustained commitment to updating the core firmware and drivers that underpin system stability and security.
Within this progress, particular models show a pattern of renewed attention. The vast majority of Framework’s products have seen at least one BIOS update during 2025, and many models have benefited from multiple updates across the year. Driver updates are somewhat more staggered in timing, with some models receiving updates that predate 2025 and others receiving more recent packages. The overall picture is one of a more consistent release cadence, with updates being more evenly distributed across the product family than in the past. This pattern aligns with the new operational approach driven by the Compal-based sustaining team, which is designed to deliver updates systematically rather than in response to sporadic issues.
The update cadence is complemented by a growing array of Linux firmware updates. Linux users now have BIOS updaters available for almost all Framework Laptop models, which can be downloaded and installed automatically through Linux distributions’ software updater tools. This automatic capability is a direct result of Framework’s adoption of the Linux Vendor Firmware Service. The LVFS-based updates ensure that many Linux users can secure firmware updates without needing Windows. This is a meaningful step toward broader platform inclusivity, given that Linux enthusiasts represent a significant portion of the Framework user base who value open-source software and flexibility.
There is, however, an exception in the LVFS update path. The 12th-gen Intel Core version of the Laptop 13 remains outside the LVFS update wheel for IME firmware updates. Because LVFS relies on distributing the Intel binary files required for IME updates, those specific components cannot be delivered through LVFS alone for this particular variant. Framework has mitigated this by offering a BIOS update option accessible through the hardware’s EFI shell, allowing Linux users to install full firmware updates without requiring Windows. This approach preserves security and feature parity where possible while accommodating Intel’s firmware distribution constraints. It’s a practical compromise that preserves the user experience and demonstrates the company’s willingness to adapt to vendor-specific limitations while keeping Linux users in mind.
A broader set of features has also arrived in 2025, supplementing the core BIOS and driver updates. Notable additions include Thunderbolt certification for the Core Ultra version of the Laptop 13 and a lineup-wide Battery Extender feature designed to reduce battery degradation for devices that stay plugged in for days at a time. The Thunderbolt certification ensures robust external device compatibility and faster, safer I/O operations, an important consideration for professionals who rely on high-speed peripherals and docking setups. The Battery Extender feature, which caps charging when the machine is connected to power for extended periods, addresses long-term battery health—a key concern for devices intended to last through multiple years of use. These features illustrate how updating a platform isn’t limited to security patches and bug fixes but also encompasses value-added capabilities that extend battery life, improve peripheral compatibility, and optimize performance.
Patel’s commentary reinforces the impression that the sustaining software-update effort is ongoing and expanding. He told Ars Technica that the team is “fully powered up” and releasing multiple BIOS and driver updates each month, covering all generations of Framework products. The key condition he cited is the continued upstream support from AMD and Intel. This framing highlights a pragmatic, partnership-driven approach to updates, acknowledging that Framework’s ability to maintain its software stack is closely tied to the upstream commitments from the major silicon vendors. The emphasis on sustained updates, rather than episodic bursts, is central to the company’s strategic narrative around durability, security, and user trust.
In terms of product scope, Framework’s update program has been stretched to six distinct Laptop 13 motherboard variants, in addition to the Laptop 16 and Laptop 12. The company’s first desktop product—curiously named the Framework Desktop—remains on track for launch later in the year. The expansion of product lines makes the update program more complex, but it also demonstrates the importance of a unified update strategy that can span multiple platforms. The interplay between new product introductions and ongoing support for older hardware is delicate: it requires robust testing, careful release planning, and clear communication with end users about how updates affect different configurations. The overarching takeaway is that Framework has embraced a comprehensive approach to maintaining software health across a growing family of devices, rather than prioritizing only the latest model.
The convergence of these developments—dedicated updating teams, Linux firmware support, expanded features, and broad model coverage—points to a stabilizing trend: a more predictable, rigorous software maintenance regime that aligns with user expectations for durability and security. It also suggests a cultural and operational shift within the company toward long-term product stewardship, with an emphasis on ensuring that devices remain current and capable long after purchase. For customers, this translates into two practical benefits: enhanced security through timely patches and a more robust, feature-rich experience driven by ongoing driver and firmware improvements. It also aligns with the environmental and economic goals of modular devices: longer device lifespans, easier upgrades, and a clearer path to meaningful updates that justify initial investment.
In the end, the progress observed by mid-2025 matters for the Framework community and the broader market. It demonstrates that a modular laptop brand can successfully implement a structured, scalable approach to software maintenance that covers BIOS, drivers, Linux firmware, and value-added features. It also underscores the importance of a close collaboration with OEM partners like Compal in delivering this sustained support, a model that other hardware makers could study as they pursue durable, upgrade-friendly products. The implications extend beyond Framework’s immediate family of devices; they offer a blueprint for how repairable, upgradeable hardware can be supported over the long term in an increasingly software-driven ecosystem. The company’s trajectory indicates that sustained, transparent software maintenance is not a niche consideration but a core component of modern hardware strategy.
Linux Support, LVFS, and Alternate Update Paths
A central pillar of Framework’s software strategy in 2025 has been the integration of Linux firmware updates via the Linux Vendor Firmware Service, a mechanism that enables many users to receive BIOS and firmware improvements through their Linux distributions. The LVFS integration aligns with Framework’s emphasis on openness, accessibility, and cross-platform compatibility. For Linux users, this means that BIOS updates, bug fixes, and new features can be delivered without resorting to Windows-based tooling, which greatly simplifies the maintenance process for enthusiasts and professionals who prefer Linux environments. The practical impact is a smoother, more integrated update experience that reduces friction for users who want to keep their Framework devices up to date with the latest firmware improvements.
The LVFS-based approach also underscores the broader partnership between Framework and the Linux community. By embracing LVFS, Framework commits to a standardized, vendor-managed approach to firmware distribution across multiple distributions, which in turn simplifies the end-user experience. In testing various Linux distributions, users can leverage distribution-level software managers to fetch and apply firmware updates, a workflow that is familiar to many, yet historically slower for some hardware vendors. The net effect is a more seamless path for Linux users to stay current with essential firmware changes that can affect system performance, stability, and security. The trend line is clear: Linux firmware updates are an expected and supported part of Framework’s software ecosystem.
However, there is a notable constraint with the 12th-gen Intel Core Laptop 13 hardware variant regarding IME firmware updates. LVFS cannot update the Intel Management Engine firmware for this model because LVFS does not distribute the necessary Intel binaries. Framework has addressed this limitation by providing an alternative route for Linux users: a BIOS update that can be installed via the hardware’s built-in EFI shell. This solution ensures Linux users can perform complete firmware updates without the need to rely on Windows, preserving the integrity of the system while accommodating Intel’s distribution constraints. The EFI shell method demonstrates a pragmatic path to full firmware updates for users who operate outside Windows ecosystems, reinforcing the company’s commitment to comprehensive, cross-platform support.
Beyond LVFS and the EFI shell workaround, the broader Linux firmware strategy benefits from Framework’s ongoing collaboration with upstream hardware vendors. As new CPUs and components are introduced, the company’s update machinery must accommodate changes in firmware interfaces, security requirements, and driver stacks. The sustained software update program is designed to adapt to these changes, responding to the cadence of upstream updates while ensuring that Framework devices remain compatible with Linux tooling and open-source ecosystems. The Linux strategy is not an isolated initiative; it is an integral part of Framework’s ongoing efforts to deliver accessible, user-friendly software maintenance for a diverse community of users who value open platforms and robust firmware management.
In addition to firmware updates, the company has pushed to broaden the availability and performance of Thunderbolt capabilities and the Battery Extender feature for Linux users, reflecting a broader commitment to cross-platform functionality and feature parity. Thunderbolt certification contributes to a more reliable and secure I/O experience for peripherals, docking stations, and high-speed storage, which are common requirements for power users and professionals. The Battery Extender feature, which limits charging cycles during extended power connections, addresses long-standing concerns about battery degradation and health, particularly for devices that remain connected to power for long periods. These features are not merely optional; they are integral to delivering a more durable and user-friendly experience across Windows and Linux platforms alike.
The results of these Linux-focused efforts are evident in user feedback and the broader ecosystem’s reception. Linux users benefit from a coordinated firmware update path that reduces the friction previously associated with firmware upgrades. While certain edge cases may still require workarounds, the overall trajectory shows an explicit, deliberate commitment to Linux support as an essential facet of Framework’s software strategy. The LVFS-based updates, the EFI shell option for the IME-related updates, and the broader vendor collaboration all contribute to a more inclusive and robust firmware ecosystem that can be leveraged by a wide range of users, from developers and testers to everyday professionals who rely on Linux or mixed-OS environments.
In sum, Framework’s Linux-focused firmware strategy demonstrates how an industry leader can integrate cross-platform maintenance into a coherent, scalable program. LVFS serves as a practical mechanism to extend firmware updates to Linux users, while the EFI shell workaround ensures that critical components like IME can be updated where LVFS cannot. Thunderbolt certification and Battery Extender capabilities further enrich the Linux experience by expanding hardware support and protecting battery health in long-running setups. Taken together, these Linux-oriented developments reflect a holistic approach to software maintenance that recognizes the importance of open-source platforms within Framework’s broader hardware strategy.
Drivers, BIOS Updates, and Feature Enhancements in 2025
2025 has proven to be a year of tangible driver and BIOS improvements for Framework’s modular laptops. The company’s renewed update cadence has resulted in more frequent BIOS revisions and driver package releases, a notable departure from the more episodic updates that characterized the prior period. The improvements are not simply cosmetic; they translate into real-world benefits, including bug fixes, performance improvements, and security enhancements that make Framework devices more reliable and capable for extended use.
Key evidence of progress includes the cadence of BIOS updates across generations and the breadth of supported devices. The company’s publicly visible update patterns show that most models have benefited from at least one firmware update in 2025, with several devices receiving multiple updates throughout the year. This pattern aligns with the sustaining software update program’s goals: to minimize long gaps between updates and maintain a consistent flow of enhancements. As BIOS updates often deliver critical fixes and new hardware support for peripherals, these updates can have a meaningful impact on system stability, compatibility with new hardware accessories, and overall user satisfaction.
Driver updates have followed a similar trajectory, with older packages gradually giving way to newer revisions as the company expands its upstream partnerships and testing capabilities. The driver packages associated with various semiconductor platforms—such as the Core Ultra variants and AMD-based configurations—reflect a broader commitment to improving performance and reliability, beyond mere security patches. While the driver history for some of the oldest packages may still reflect releases dating back to mid-2024, the general direction shows a trend toward more recent driver revisions in line with the latest hardware capabilities. The cumulative effect is that Framework devices are better aligned with contemporary software stacks, enabling improved performance, hardware acceleration, and compatibility with current software ecosystems.
A notable milestone in 2025 is the expansion of BIOS and driver updates across all generations of Framework products, with the company maintaining a sustainable cadence that ensures new updates continue to flow as long as Intel and AMD provide upstream support. Patel’s statements emphasize this continuity: updates will be released as long as upstream vendors maintain their support pipelines, underscoring the collaborative nature of the software maintenance program. This stance signals a pragmatic approach to ongoing modernization, acknowledging that hardware lifecycles and software ecosystems are interdependent and that consistent updates are essential to preserving the value of the devices over time.
The company’s update strategy also includes a commitment to new features that enhance usability and longevity. Thunderbolt certification for the Core Ultra Laptop 13, for example, improves the reliability and performance of external devices and high-speed I/O operations. The Battery Extender feature, available across the lineup, helps protect battery health by capping charging cycles during extended sustained power. Both features illustrate how updates can deliver tangible, user-visible benefits beyond security and stability. They also demonstrate how firmware and driver updates can be leveraged to introduce new capabilities that address real user needs, such as better peripheral support and prolonged battery health for devices used in mobility-heavy environments.
In practical terms, drivers and BIOS updates in 2025 have contributed to a more seamless user experience. Users who rely on external displays, docking stations, or high-speed external storage may notice improved compatibility and performance thanks to updated drivers and firmware. Those who use frameworks for extended periods away from frequent power cycling, particularly professionals who keep devices plugged in for long durations, can benefit from Battery Extender’s preventive measures against accelerated battery degradation. These improvements collectively reduce the total cost of ownership by maintaining performance and security while extending device longevity. They also help Framework’s machines remain competitive against other modular and repairable laptops by offering a stronger, multi-generational software support story.
From a leadership perspective, the sustained momentum behind BIOS and driver updates demonstrates that the company’s strategy is working. Patel’s insistence that updates will continue as long as upstream vendors provide support reinforces a forward-looking view: a long-term relationship with Intel and AMD is essential to maintaining a healthy software ecosystem for Framework devices. The result is a stable, predictable maintenance schedule that users can rely on, rather than unpredictable bursts of updates tied to short-term goals. For customers, this translates into consistent security patches, ongoing performance improvements, and new features that are deployed through a careful, tested process that prioritizes reliability and usability.
The impact on the broader product portfolio is also meaningful. The company’s expansion into the Laptop 16, Laptop 12, and the soon-to-launch Framework Desktop increases the total surface area for which updates must be coordinated. A well-managed update program that scales across multiple platforms is essential to keeping everything in sync and ensuring that the user experience remains uniform across devices. The robust update framework described in 2025 demonstrates that Framework has matured from a smaller, more experimental operator to a company capable of managing a more complex ecosystem with confidence. The practical upshot is that more users can depend on Framework devices to function well for longer, with regular firmware, security, and performance improvements arriving on a scheduled basis.
In short, 2025 has solidified Framework’s reputation for delivering meaningful BIOS and driver updates, and for expanding the scope of those updates to a broader set of devices and features. The company’s renewed emphasis on ongoing maintenance, combined with a practical approach to Linux firmware, has created a more resilient software ecosystem that aligns with users’ expectations for durable, upgradeable hardware. The ongoing updates are not just technical wins; they reinforce Framework’s core mission of providing repairable, long-lasting laptops that remain secure, functional, and relevant as technology evolves.
Product Lineup, Platform Expansion, and the Update Marathon
Framework’s product strategy in 2025 reflects a deliberate effort to align hardware development with a long-term software maintenance plan. The company continues to manage a diverse lineup, including six distinct Laptop 13 motherboard variants, the Laptop 16, and the Laptop 12, all of which require coordinated BIOS and driver support. The expansion of the lineup across generations and configurations necessitates a robust update mechanism that can adapt to diverse hardware backbones while delivering a consistent, reliable experience to users. The addition of a first Framework Desktop further broadens the scope of software updates that the company must manage, signaling a broader ambition to provide modular, upgradeable computing across form factors.
A central tenet of this strategy is the need for balance between introducing new capabilities and sustaining older systems. Framework’s past focus on new hardware spin-ups occasionally pulled attention away from older devices, but management has signaled a shift toward a more balanced resource allocation that prioritizes both innovation and long-term support. This balance is crucial for a company that markets devices designed to be repaired, upgraded, and maintained across multiple years of use. The broader product goals require a cohesive, end-to-end approach to software updates that can span different motherboard generations and device families, ensuring that security patches and performance improvements reach every supported device in a timely manner.
The company’s internal and external communications reflect this shift toward a unified update philosophy. By acknowledging the complexity of maintaining multiple generations and product families, Framework demonstrates a willingness to invest in a mature support ecosystem rather than a purely growth-driven hardware strategy. The presence of a dedicated sustaining software update team—coupled with a clear plan for ongoing updates as long as upstream support persists—provides a credible foundation for customers seeking durable devices they can rely on for many years. The introduction of the Framework Desktop is a natural extension of Framework’s modular, upgradeable design philosophy, signaling an intention to replicate the same maintenance discipline across new products.
From a practical perspective, customers gain from a more predictable update path, including consistent BIOS and driver updates, improvements in security posture, and expanded feature support. The availability of Thunderbolt certification, Battery Extender, and Linux-based update options translates into a broader set of benefits for users with varied workflows and hardware accessories. A more coherent update strategy across all devices reduces fragmentation and increases the odds that a single firmware baseline can support a broad range of configurations. In this sense, the product lineup expansion becomes less of an obstacle to update cadence and more of a catalyst for reinforcing a uniform software maintenance standard.
Moreover, Framework’s approach to product lines—where multiple generations share a common software baseline and update process—improves the predictability of the user experience. End users can anticipate that regardless of the device they own within Framework’s ecosystem, a reliable flow of BIOS and driver updates will arrive on a scheduled basis. The update system’s scalability is critical as more devices come into the portfolio, including the upcoming Framework Desktop. The company’s ability to manage updates across a larger hardware landscape without sacrificing quality or speed is a testament to the maturation of its software operations and a signal to customers that Framework is committed to long-term ecosystem health.
The 2025 product strategy also reflects a broader social and environmental rationale. The emphasis on repairability, upgradeability, and sustained software maintenance aligns with the goal of reducing electronic waste by extending device lifespans. By ensuring that devices remain modern through regular firmware and software improvements, Framework helps customers extract more value from their purchases, reducing the need for frequent replacements. The company’s approach to updates, testing, and cross-platform compatibility thus serves as a model for how hardware businesses can deliver durable products that stay relevant in a rapidly evolving software environment.
In sum, Framework’s 2025 product strategy demonstrates a coordinated approach to hardware evolution and software stewardship. The expansion of the laptop lineup, the impending desktop product launch, and the consistent, enterprise-grade software maintenance program together convey a clear message: Framework is building a multi-generational, upgradable ecosystem whose value lies not only in the hardware’s modularity but also in the enduring, well-supported software foundation that powers it. This strategy promises a more seamless user experience, stronger security, and longer device lifespans, reinforcing Framework’s reputation as a pioneer in repairable, upgradeable computing.
Sustaining Software Updates: Commitment, Cadence, and Long-Term Vision
At the core of Framework’s renewed software strategy is a formal commitment to sustaining updates that spans generations of products and aligns with upstream vendor support. The sustaining software update team’s role is to ensure that BIOS, firmware, and driver updates continue to be produced and delivered on a predictable cadence. The goal is not merely to react to security incidents or to fix isolated bugs; it is to create a steady continuum of enhancements that improve security, stability, and functionality across Framework’s product line for years to come. This commitment, articulated by Patel and reinforced by the operational changes at Compal, signals a long-term strategy designed to support the modular hardware Framework markets.
The cadence of updates is a tangible measure of the company’s progress. Across 2025, Framework has moved toward a monthly or near-monthly release rhythm for BIOS and driver updates, spanning all generations of its devices. This cadence is not arbitrary; it is built upon a disciplined testing framework, cross-team coordination, and a clear ownership structure that makes it feasible to manage updates across multiple hardware configurations. The cadence is also designed to minimize user disruption, with well-communicated release notes, estimated impact assessments, and rollback options when necessary. In practice, customers can expect a more predictable experience in which updates are anticipated rather than surprises. The predictability matters as more users rely on Framework devices for professional work, where unplanned downtime due to firmware issues can be costly.
A defining aspect of the sustaining update program is its dependence on upstream support. Framework’s ability to deliver ongoing BIOS and driver updates is closely tied to the upstream commitments from Intel and AMD. Patel’s framing makes this dependency explicit: updates will continue as long as Intel and AMD maintain upstream support for the platforms Framework uses. This creates a shared risk model, acknowledging that the company’s software health is partly determined by the upstream ecosystem. Yet, Framework’s response to this reality is a proactive strategy designed to maximize resilience: by diversifying across product families and maintaining a broad, cross-generational test matrix, the company reduces exposure to any single upstream disruption. The result is a more robust update pipeline and greater confidence for customers who rely on Framework devices in demanding contexts.
From a product lifecycle perspective, the sustaining software update program ensures older devices remain viable even as new hardware is introduced. The ongoing maintenance reduces the temptation to replace devices at the first sign of an aging software stack. Instead, users can expect that the company will deliver continued improvements that address new security threats, compatibility issues with accessory ecosystems, and performance improvements that maintain a competitive edge for older hardware. This long-term perspective resonates with the values of the Framework community, including those who prioritize repairability, upgradeability, and the environmental benefits of extended device lifecycles.
The human dimension of this program should not be underestimated. The sustaining team’s work demands careful project management, cross-functional collaboration, and a culture of continuous learning. As new hardware features and firmware capabilities emerge, the team must incorporate them into the update pipeline while maintaining backward compatibility with older devices. The team must also communicate clearly with customers about update timing, potential impacts, and how to access new firmware features. By embedding these practices into the company’s DNA, Framework builds a sustainable model of software maintenance that can scale with the company as its product portfolio grows.
The broader implications of Framework’s sustained software-update strategy extend to the user experience, developer ecosystems, and the general health of the platform. A consistent, transparent update cadence fosters trust among users and developers who depend on the stability of the platform. It reduces the risk associated with modernization efforts and provides a reliable baseline for software developers who build tools and workflows around Framework hardware. It also demonstrates a corporate commitment to circular economy principles by extending device lifecycles through ongoing software maintenance. For customers who are evaluating the total cost of ownership, the sustained software-update program provides a compelling argument that first adopters are not left with obsolete hardware after a short period; instead, their devices are kept current through regular firmware and driver improvements.
The final takeaway is that Framework’s sustained software-update program represents more than a set of patch notes. It embodies a forward-looking philosophy of product stewardship that recognizes software updates as a core feature of the devices Framework sells. It is a commitment to keep devices safe, secure, and relevant across multiple generations, a promise that is reinforced by leadership’s explicit statements and the visible operational changes at the Compal factory. The combination of governance, process, and upstream collaboration positions Framework to deliver durable, reliable, and upgradeable laptops that can stand the test of time in a fast-changing technology landscape. As the company continues to execute on this plan, customers can expect to see ongoing improvements that reinforce Framework’s core values of repairability, longevity, and user empowerment.
Conclusion
Framework’s progress on software support for its modular laptops marks a meaningful shift from a period of uneven updates to a sustained, disciplined approach to firmware, drivers, and platform enhancement. The company’s renewed strategy—anchored by a dedicated Compal-based update team, expanded Linux firmware support via LVFS, a clear commitment to ongoing BIOS and driver updates, and a roadmap that spans the Laptop 13 family, Laptop 16, Laptop 12, and the forthcoming Framework Desktop—reflects a mature, long-term view of product stewardship. The strategic emphasis on continuous improvements across generations shows Framework’s willingness to invest in the durability and reliability of its devices, aligning with users’ expectations for security, performance, and longevity.
The evidence from 2025 demonstrates tangible progress: nearly all Framework laptops have received BIOS and driver updates within the last year, Linux users can access firmware updates through LVFS on most models, and new features like Thunderbolt certification and Battery Extender have broadened the functional and longevity benefits of their devices. While certain constraints remain—such as IME firmware updates for the 12th-gen Laptop 13 being outside LVFS’s distribution path—the company’s approach offers practical solutions, including EFI shell-based updates for Linux users, to ensure comprehensive firmware coverage where possible.
In this broader context, Framework’s approach to software sustains a core principle: the hardware’s repairable and upgradeable design must be supported by an equally robust software maintenance program. The sustained software update initiative aims to deliver ongoing improvements and security patches on a predictable cadence, ensuring that devices across generations stay current with evolving hardware and software ecosystems. Patel’s insistence that updates will continue as long as upstream vendors provide support underscores a pragmatic, collaborative outlook that recognizes the interdependence of Framework with Intel and AMD. This shared dependency does not undermine Framework’s mission; rather, it defines the contours of a sustainable, forward-looking strategy that seeks to maximize device longevity, reduce environmental impact, and deliver a reliable, user-centered computing experience.
For readers and customers, the key takeaway is clear: Framework is steadily transforming its software support into a durable, scalable operation that aligns with the company’s foundational commitments to repairability, upgradeability, and long-term usability. The combination of a strengthened update workflow, broader Linux firmware support, and ongoing feature enhancements points to a future in which Framework devices remain relevant and secure across multiple product cycles. As Framework continues to execute on this plan, users can anticipate a continued stream of BIOS and driver updates, more seamless Linux firmware support, and an expanding slate of practical features designed to extend device lifetimes and improve overall user experience. The company’s evolving software maintenance program thus serves as a compelling example of how hardware manufacturers can build sustainable, customer-centric platforms that endure beyond the latest hardware release.
